It's against my better judgment to respond; I am not going to engage in a flame-out with you. But I'm going to try ONCE, just in case you completely missed the point of my post, and also in the hopeful case you aren't the type of person I think you are, based on the posts you've made on this thread.
Engaging in name-calling, and the personal attacks are unlikely to convince me that you "like to discuss the prospects of stocks..."! In fact, just the opposite is true: You take great offense to a little fun-poking (re-read your own stuff - you fairly begged for something; anything). You blew up at the mere implication that what you are touting isn't the greatest thing since sliced bread. You don't appear to be looking for information. Is any view contrary to yours fodder to be shot up with your nastiest, quickest response? Well, my skin ain't so thin. In short, you meet my personal profile for an Internet hypester. I am not a stock analyst. Don't play one on Tee-Vee. But If you ask for opinions, or responses, you're gonna git 'em. So why be glum? By the way, I did hear a thing or two about your Company, and surprisingly, it was positive. Good luck with it. Do me one favor, though - if you want to repond, go ahead. But I'm not responding to uncivil, drivel like the last post.
G. Stoner |
