EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bagladdy who wrote (1656)	3/18/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: Mel Spivak	Read Replies (1) of 2383

Patent cases are "civil" (not criminal). As long as the case was brought within the time allowed (Statute of Limitations) then it is not barred by time. Once the case is in "the system" it is subject to the scheduling "whims" of the Judge. Eventually they get to it. Scott may have had a 3rd kid by then. The next step in Ct, is the Markman where the Judge will "interpret the "meaning" of the patent. That is the key for us and "the market". A reasonably broad definition of its meaning by the Judge is worth (to us) more than a very narrow one. Back in this thread in the early and mid summer ('97) GRC defined the plain meaning GIFT supports vs the contrived meaning the Defendants support. Witnesses will testify. The Judge will decide. With a good definition, if Scott is still in GIFT, among the names of his possible 4th baby may then be David (Fink), Arnold F, maybe even GRC <gg>. Mel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next