SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ACRT about to move to new highs
ACRT 0.110-7.6%Dec 30 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Goulds who wrote (3794)3/19/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: F. Lynn  Read Replies (2) of 7054
 
"How about the fact that he said TADS weren't patentable, then said they weren't legally enforcable after he found out the application had already been accepted?"

Being accepted at the patent office is a little like getting an audit done: the GARBAGE IN, GARBARGE OUT principle applies. Do you really believe that the patent office does exhaustive background checks on every industry? They do a couple of checks--no red flags appear, they approve the patent. The real fun comes when enforcement is attempted by the patent recipient......then the patent lawyers run up the bill at 400/hr. Don't think that just b/c the guvment say so that this is a valid patent--any lawyer would tell you otherwise
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News