SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Chromatics Color Sciences International. Inc; CCSI
CCSI 21.11+0.7%Nov 24 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: JanyBlueEyes who wrote (1462)3/19/1998 6:56:00 PM
From: M. Frank Greiffenstein  Read Replies (1) of 5736
 
Let me support you on this one Janybird...

The issue is not whether the device is better than traditional tests, the issue is whether it is at least as good. If CCSIs device is as good as heelpricks in specificty and sensitivity, then the device is better to use becasue of reduced side effects and lower costs.

Prozac does not work any better than traditional tricylic antidepressants such as Elavil, but Prozac is preferred because it less "less dirty", ie.., fewer side effects.

If one had their choice between two equally effective treatments, and one is less painful/more tolerable, which would you pick?

DocStone
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext