International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: go4it who wrote (31065)	3/19/1998 11:08:00 PM
From: PETE STONEY	Read Replies (1) of 35569

Chuck, Looking back at some of the past posts about the NASDAQ delisting-- there seemed to be a negative spin to them. I'm not sure how this all started if it was NASDAQ initiating the delisting or if it was IPM that was requesting the delisting. In reading the IPM press release dated Feb 12th, to me it looked like IPM was requesting the delisting hearing. I know its hard to second guess what IPM's intentions are but maybe IPM would not view the delisting as a negative. Time will tell. I still believe IPM can and will do what they started out to do. Pete

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next