DACQ - Here we go again? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DACQ - Here we go again?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Dr. Raymond E. Novak II who wrote (3342)	3/20/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: rubin	Read Replies (1) of 3501

Most of these pennys come from a tarnished back round. If I remember correctly it was not Jethro behind the BS, it was Ed cox and the former president. Jethro was left with the bag. From day one I beleive Jethro was led to believe that some revenues from the tin mine were going to be used to support his project but of course that never happened. As far as debt,I dont believe there is any except accounting expense to bring current.. The Bolivian mine deal disintergrated based on DACQ not being able to raise money to purchase the needed equipment. Jethro has been approached about selling DACQ as a shell but refuses. He said that would not be in the best interest of share holders(since when did they care). I also suggested that he do a reverse split and explain to the public his ideas and Maybe the stock price will rise enough to raise the needed capital. He feels that would most likely not work and punish the existing shareholders more. My point is anything is better than sitting there with his thumb up his ass!!! Maybe some other dedicated DACQers have some ideas for our friend Jethro(besides jumping off a bridge) Regards Gary Rubin

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next