SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CellularVision (CVUS): 2-way LMDS wireless cable.

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bernard Levy who wrote (1664)3/20/1998 8:47:00 PM
From: wonk  Read Replies (1) of 2063
 
Dr Levy:

While reflectors have been used for years, I doubt that they will be used in any quantity. Its not worth the headache.

To my knowledge, the FCC no longer issues authorizations in point-to-point services for periscopes and reflectors (existing links are grandfathered). This is due to splatter which tremendously complicates frequency coordination.

Even in a service such as this, reflectors will complicate interference control. Also, as you mentioned, any misalignment (reflection coeffecient) is going to seriously impact the fade margin of the link.

From the perspective of the operator, how do you handle these problems. Lets say you have a potential customer who is not LOS. With a reflector you can get him reliable service, but the fade margin is reduced by half. You therefore know that in a signifcant rainstorm his service will go out even though his next door neighbor's service (who for the purposes of this example does have LOS) stays on. Do you sell the service to this customer?

IMHO, I don't think that reflectors are practical.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext