SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (8432)3/21/1998 1:08:00 AM
From: Loft Guy  Read Replies (2) of 64865
 
I think much of this argument over splitting Java just emphasizes how
highly Java as a programming language is regarded. Seems to me the
splitting of Java is not a problem. There will be standardized Java
that runs on all platforms. There will be specialized Java for specific platforms to replace existing languages not as good as Java.

Programmers and IT depts will have no problem distinguishing between
the two. Obviously, the standardized Java would be the better choice
since then it will still work for the next OS. But there might be
applications which are OS specific for which platform dependent Java
is the easier choice as it has access to OS function calls. It may not be pretty or elegant, but it might save enough time to be worth it.

I think it will be interesting if MSFT ever releases a major product written in Java. Question will be whether they go after all platforms and use standard Java or limit themselves to only Windows machine.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext