George:
Thanks for the clarification. That is my understanding of the
% participation by Mink assuming a pipe goes into production.
In any event, 39 % of a producing diamond mine is potentially
huge!
Incidentally, I believe that Mr. Andrews should clarify where
he is coming from as far as his posts are concerned. Since he
was formerly associated with Mink, and now is no longer, I have
to question the motives behind his posts, which are characterized
by a lot of capitalized words and language that is a little difficult
to understand. With all due respect, is he angry with the company
etc.? If his posts are underlain by animosity toward the company
and its management, I personally cannot evaluate his posts with
any degree of certainty.
If there are gem-quality diamonds in the core, all of this talk
will be moot, and we will have a screamer. I have to smile a little
as I read about all of the excitement about the Alberta Diamond play
where we are talking about tiny diamonds, whereas no one seems to
be paying attention to the 100 + carat diamonds found in Mali!!
Reminds me of the Congo, as well, where copper ores grading 8-10
% are not unusual, whereas in the Americas, we get excited about
1% levels.
Regards
Dan |
