John,
Thanks for the response! Yes, anytime a legitimate 'bear' wants to debate the merits of the investment, I'm all for that. A company should be able to withstand the scrutiny, and in the debate, the company should be able to demonstrate it warrants the investment. So, the bear can actually be a 'bullish' presence.
But s martin attacks his prey,(companies, shareholders, investors), using slander, libel and misinformation, IMO, to scare investors into selling on behalf of shortsellers with large naked short positions.
IMO, his presence here is proof positive of a large naked short position and possible/potential squeeze.
I wish you all the best. Remember, the truth is the best defense against slander & libel.
Pugs |
