<OFF TOPIC>
LE, what's my vendetta against you?
I am a shareholder. My money is on the table.
When you go to the subjects header of this thread, the only thing listed is the first line of the post, until you click the hyperlink.
When you posted the fake news release, you purposefully left the first line in a misleading way.
No duh your fake post was a parody. For those of us who actually own shares of this stock, and were actively waiting for news ( something you were aware of by the way since you post so actively on the thread ), it was a slap in the face, not speaking for others, just myself.
So, a whole thread waits for news, and you post a fake news release, a class act if I've ever seen one.
<<Or are you "looking out" for those less intelligent than your brilliant self?>>
No, I'm a shareholder, my motivations are clear. Yours, however, are not. They are neither clear, nor reasonable.
<<No, I did not. Go read the original post.>>
You never said "I'm going to sell all my shares before trading is halted"?
Message 3184903
<<I did do that. I really don't think you have access to my trading records. I really don't think you know the number of shares I had, or the blocks I sold them in... Unless you believe I kept the stock and am still a shareholder...>>
No, but Cheryl posted the trading log for 1/2 hour after market open and you either owned next to nothing of the stock to be able to rationalize the energy you put into bashing it or you are lying.
It's in the same link above.
<<I did suring the 4 million share day, and noted it in my post. I am sorry that my job precludes me from hanging out here all day. I had planned to meet you in Chicago, remember? Is the trading floor here, by chance?>>
Vacation time come in? I don't know if you are in Chicago or Alabama.
<<How could posting their merger partner not be objective information? It's neither negative nor positive, just what they are doing. I've been reading the respones... some people like it, some don't. Ah, democracy, where you give people information and let them make their own decisions. >>
So I guess you have the negotiations and FAMH's best interest at heart? Anyone who's read this thread since January would be able to figure out that your sole motivation is to bash the company. Are you on our side now? If an axe murderer offers to give me lift home I think I'd pass.
<<Of course, we could always have dictatorship, where one person takes it upon himself to discredit another, and get him kicked off the thread. What's your motivation for that, Jin?>>
Let's see, you outright defamed the company and it's officers, you lied when making comparisons while conveniently leaving out pertinent information that could actually be positive for the company in making a comparison, you said trading would be halted on FAMH, you insulted Wayne J. a terrifically nice individual, you called FAMH shareholder (indirectly) stupid on the Ask God thread, you referred to Ira Monas as Liar Monas. . .
YOU VIOLATED THE TERMS OF USE ON SI
I wish I could just avoid you, but I can't, because for no rational reason you keep popping on the thread.
Jin. |
