International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: mark silvers who wrote (31164)	3/24/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Mark, super comment, thanks. I have speculated many many times that IPM wouldn't go belly up due to its commitments to Phoenix (of course, they could for other reasons). Phoenix requires success with the desert dirt's to advance it's objectives for property appreciation. Cut off one's nose to spite their face? Hardly. One speculation reason for belly up is now officially removed. That certainly should help the stock value. On the other hand, the uncertainty for delisting and the change in management pressures the stock. God, I love this crap!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next