SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Valueman who wrote (2327)3/24/1998 4:58:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (2) of 10852
 
Ok, so assuming that 24 sats are lost (I think its safe to say the odds are that it won't be worse than this) and a production of 4 a month, then that means a 6 month delay to Globalstar's start of service from a production viewpoint.

Adding to that, is a delay due to lack of launch slots. Do you think its safe to say that this delay would be 6 months or less? (Loral does have backup reservations for launches, as I understand it.)

That would mean a total 12 month delay to start of service. Additionally, the book value of the company would be discounted due to the amortization of the sats already in orbit.

This satisfies my concerns about the risk-- If this happened, and G* was delayed 12 or even 18 months, I'm sure the stock would take a big hit in the near term, but 5 or 10 years from now, the value will not be that significantly affected.

Is there a bigger risk to Loral than launch failures? Their production of sats has a good record, their financing is conservative enough, what else is there?

Dragonfly

(Not to discount this risk, I'm simply saying it's acceptable to me. The G* story is good enough that even with the delay, they will be highly competitive with Iridium, IMHO.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext