SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VISX

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Amy Feller who wrote (464)3/24/1998 5:06:00 PM
From: Amy Feller  Read Replies (1) of 1754
 
VISX Responds to FTC Administrative Proceeding

SANTA CLARA, Calif.--(BW HealthWire)--March 24, 1998--VISX, Inc. (NASDAQ:VISX) today acknowledged that the Federal Trade Commission

("FTC") has initiated administrative proceedings against VISX and Summit Technology, Inc. ("Summit").

The FTC complaint seeks to dissolve Pillar Point Partners, a partnership that holds patent rights relating to laser ophthalmic surgery licensed by VISX and Summit in 1992. The complaint charges that VISX and Summit have fixed prices, and also challenges the enforceability of certain patents licensed by VISX to Pillar Point.

VISX strenuously denies the price fixing and other allegations. Since first receiving approval to sell its product from the Food and Drug Administration, VISX has competed aggressively with Summit, and charges different prices for equipment and procedures.

Mark Logan, VISX's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, stated: "We worked hard to resolve the Pillar Point issues by mutual consent. We are disappointed that the Commission decided to commence administrative proceedings while discussions were ongoing. Nevertheless, we intend to continue our efforts to resolve the Pillar Point matter by means other than administrative litigation. In fact, on February 17th, VISX sued in California Superior Court to dissolve the partnership. As part of that lawsuit, VISX is seeking many of the remedies the FTC has requested in its complaint."

With respect to the patent issue, Mr. Logan continued, "We are puzzled by the challenge to VISX's patents by the FTC. The complaint challenges the 1990 resolution of complicated patent interference proceedings and asserts that certain documents were not cited to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") as prior art. Those claims are unfounded. The interferences were resolved in full compliance with PTO procedures, with the advice of the country's foremost experts on interference proceedings, and VISX is confident that its fundamental patents cite all prior art relevant to the invention. Finally, as the FTC has stated, the issuance of a complaint is not a finding or ruling that any law has been violated. VISX will continue to work with the FTC to address their concerns."

CONTACT:

VISX, Inc.

Lola Wood, 408/733-2020

ir@visx.com

visx.com

KEYWORD: CALIFORNIA

BW0227 MAR 24,1998
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext