SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Kulicke and Soffa
KLIC 46.40+0.2%2:09 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sunny who wrote (2755)3/25/1998 4:34:00 AM
From: Dr. Ronald Peter Hellendall  Read Replies (2) of 5482
 
Sunny - <OFF TOPIC>

In my view, the idea of entering the biotech sector as a counterweight to another lagging sector is a highly questionable premise. This is especially true when fleeing the volatile, though earnings driven, semiconductor world to the realm of dream cures and rapid burn rates (the rate at which a company consumes investment capital). The burn rate implies, of course, years and years of substantial loses with the payoff dependent upon mother nature supporting the research hypothesis.

Regardless of all that, and despite the fact that I do follow (read: own stock in) some BT companies, I won't 'reveal' any of them. There's a simple reason for this: my interest was and is generated by the 'intellectual' capital, the research muscle, and not by earnings. Very idealistic...but it's easy to misconstrue brains for business savvy.

So I'll say this: the wisest thing to do is to go for big pharma (Merck, Pfizer. Lilly, J & J, etc.). If that's too boring, search for biotechs with a history of earnings (more likely in the medical device than pharmaceutical arena), and be very, very patient.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext