SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 49.09-0.3%2:47 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Lahet who wrote (4521)10/24/1996 4:50:00 AM
From: Aaron Cooperband   of 186894
 
Steve -

An earlier letter on this thread pointed out that and Alpha machine at 533mhz (I believe) will run Intel-standard NT faster than a Pentium. No PC users would be tempted to switch to the Alpha, however, unless it offered better performance at a better price. While I don't know the cost of that system, I doubt its less than the Pentium.

If this situation continues, I agree that there will be minimal demand for non-Intel platforms to run Intel-standard NT software. If DEC etc. are able to progress their technology fast enough to catch up with Intel, then at some point a non-Intel standard chip running recompiled code might pose a competitive threat to Intel.

How has the performance per dollar relationship of Intel-standard chips vs. non-Intel standard chips changed in recent history (assuming that each is running an Intel-standard OS)? In other words, from a PC buyer's point of view have the non-Intel standard CPU manufacturers been catching up? Has Intel been able to lengthen its performance/$ lead vs. its competitors, or have the competitors been closing the distance?

Aaron
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext