KLIC is looking for v.p. of marketing, and it hasn't headhunted anyone from contributors from this incredibly intelligent list?
For shame.
Seriously, S.K. reads this thread, I'd assume. I'd be open to an offer. I have expertise in the marketing area. I'm sure that others on the list do, too. So, why not open search to shareholders first?
We like the co., support it w/ our $$, so why not look to list for v.p. of marketing?
Seems to me, KLIC needs to do a better job not only in marketing for The Street but also in shareholder relations.
Looking at getting info to shareholders first wd. be a good idea. Why do we have to ferret it out? We're owners, right?
Why don't we get this? This smacks of old-time, hierarchial bureaucratic management.
Hello! The web is here to stay, right? I like KLIC, but it seems it plays by old rules.
Look at Paul Argenti's _Corporate Communications_ that I use in the honors management communications class I teach (ok, i'm being self serving).
Have Scott et al. read _The Discipline of Market Leaders_? KLIC wdn't have to be so volatile if it communicated better and understood how to position itself in terms of a specific market discipline.
Is there some kind of conflict of interest of KLIC officials responding to questions on this list? Am I naive re. SEC regs. or something?
Why wdn't S.K. or a surrogate want to communicate with shareholders re. job openings in particular and the company in general in this thread?
I don't get it. I'd like to hear the KLIC corpcom theory and practice.
EOR (End Of Rant)
semimike |
