SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doug DuBois who wrote (2351)3/26/1998 2:39:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (2) of 10852
 
Thanks for correcting me on the danger of a launch failure. I've been looking at other risks, and I think competition will be the second biggest risk:

"Based on falling long distance rates and price competition, we have lowered our assumed pricing to $1.33 per minute, falling to $0.76 by 2006. We continue to assume Iridium will invest substantially to capture subscribers, beginning at $750 per new subscriber in 1998, falling to $300 per new subscriber by 2003."

This is from a Merrill Lynch report on Iridium. If Globalstar is charging $0.47 a minute to the providers, and the call is ultimately routed on terrestrial long distance lines at an additional cost of $0.30 to $0.60 a minute (or more) then the prices for a call on both systems get pretty competitive. Remember, since Iridium routes the call between satellites, whether the destination is a POTS or Iridium phone, there isn't a long distance charge added, the call just routes down the gateway local to the POTS phone on the destination end.

So, in the longer run, I think the price difference will be a wash. Globalstar has an advantage in signal quality and having more motivated local reps, Iridium has an advantage in coverage and better latency.

Dragonfly
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext