SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 48.76-1.0%10:26 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (4540)10/24/1996 3:29:00 PM
From: Mark Brophy   of 186894
 
Re: PPro vs. Alpha system prices

I just checked out the latest issue of Computer Graphics World and found a company in San Jose called Core Microsystems that sells a 200 MHz PPro with a CD-ROM, 2GB HD, 64M DRAM, graphics accelerator, and 21" monitor for $6000. A 433MHz Alpha system configured the same costs $10,000.

The PPro performance benchmarks are 6.7 for SPECfp95 and 8.1 for SPECint95. The Alpha system reaches SPECfp95 22.1 and SPECint95 14.3.

So, dividing it out, the PPro system costs $741/SPECint and the Alpha costs $699/SPECint. For the same integer performance, Alpha costs 5% less. For floating point operations, the PPro costs $895/SPECfp and the Alpha costs $453/SPECfp. So, Alpha gives you the same floating point performance for 50% less money.

For CAD/CAE and 3D apps that use floating point heavily, the Alpha is clearly a better choice. For a web server that uses integer math, PPro is probably better, although that is a matter of some debate. Netscape uses an Alpha server for their web site and Microsoft uses an Intel box. They never agree on anything!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext