SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: S. E. Baker who wrote (775)	3/27/1998 10:38:00 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) of 7235

Hello Steve Glad to hear it. I was rereading the last NR from KLA/IAR on the Back Lake project. Granted it was not from SUF and therefore suspect but I was particularly intrigued by the description and characterization of the geochemistry of the 5-6 other geochemical trains SUF found on the far end of this property. If SUF did indeed characterize the chemistry of these trains in the words used in that release, it gives me hope well beyond the current drilling program planned for Munn Lake. One other point regarding why SUF might be convinced there is a pipe in Munn Lake that I overlooked the other day. The Yuri kimberlite and its sisters are huge. These are not 4 meter boulders but in fact chunks of rock so big that SUF originally thought they were outcropping kimberlite. Whether these were blown out of a kimberlite or scoured by glaciers, the source would have had to have been pipe sized to have given birth to such girth. It would be interesting to know if that bay is easily damned and how shallow it is? Regards

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next