SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rocky Reid who wrote (51490)3/28/1998 8:20:00 AM
From: Fred Fahmy  Read Replies (2) of 58324
 
Re: QGLY

I find it amazing that all the key arguments you use against IOM are the same exact same problems that face QGLY, yet you still promote QGLY

1) QGLY is the definition of a "one trick pony".

2) QGLY's fast sales growth rate (due primarily to channel stuffing of a new well hyped product) is slowing (this according to the company itself).

3) WS hates QGLY.

Now you are highlighting another similarity between them. Namely, that some people consider QGLY a buyout target at these levels...just like what some people are saying about IOM.

All of the similarities are amazing yet you have completely opposite opinion of these stocks....hmmm??

Unlike IOM, however, all it would take is one study to contradict the one study that propelled QGLY to begin with to and the company would become worthless over night. Don't be surprised if such a study turns up down the road, especially in terms of Coldsleeze's effectiveness for repeat users.

FF
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News