SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : WARNING- have you been warned by SI? Let's talk

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jbe who wrote (1174)3/29/1998 4:26:00 AM
From: 246810  Read Replies (2) of 1614
 
We typically call those words from the past "anglo-saxon." They are words that were used in common language until the more "cultured" developed euphenisms and then looked down on the rabble who didn't or couldn't change their form of expression. Since the "vulgar" people used those words, they became vulgar.

Similarly, crap and shit have pretty much been accepted into ordinary discourse. Crap in the 50's and shit in the 60's. "BLANK" has not so easily been accepted. It has been forced down persons' ears since the 60's but still grates on most people and so is rejected by those who want to communicate instead of shock. (There is a place for shock in the language, and I use the word myself when I feel the shock value is appropriate and those it is directed to will understand it is shock not my normal form of speech.)

Now, two more things:

Poetry and Propriety Are Absolutely Incompatible!! That is not true. Certainly Emily Dickenson and Carl Sandburg did not use BLANK. Emily, although mysteriously in love, was not improper.

I am a licensed Professional Engineer and therefore allowed to shoot from the hip. This discourse is about BLANK not about the poem. I will now go search on Flynn and see how I feel about the poem.

246810
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext