SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IBM
IBM 305.75+0.3%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote (2703)3/29/1998 7:07:00 PM
From: Robert Scott Diver  Read Replies (1) of 8218
 
Jules, Glad to see the bear is back. My answers to your questions:
-- Why IBM has excess semiconductor manufacturing capacity in the first place?
Why are you assuming excess capacity? Isn't it possible that more capacity can be put on line? It seems clear to me that capacity is being increased by IBM.
-- How much it will cost IBM in the division of management's time and personnel talent, to support multiple PC products?
Unless IBM has gone nuts, one would assume that costs are more than covered.
--How IBM, and its partners, will be able to sell x86 parts at 25% less than Intel and still have margins enough to support meaningful profits for both AMD and IBM?
Intel has huge margins. 25% less than Intel margins would support a very satisfactory profit.
--What will the closer ties with AMD do to the existing and future relationships of AMD's customers, now that they are IBM's new, and in some cases, more fortified competitors, (CPQ, EDS, Fugitsu, etc.)?
My impression of the "fortified" competitors was they were underperforming IBM. Their announcements/warnings and stock prices would seem to support my view.

Long IBM. Good luck with your investing. Scott


Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext