Valentine/ ALL: you wrote: >Check the SC record of this case on the aforementioned August, 1 date. You may be unpleasantly surprised.<
Why on earth would I be surprised unpleasantly? Please point this out so that I may be enlightened? BTW, the chronology of the summer's events goes like this. I draw YOUR attention to what happened on August 2.:
July 15, 1997
SCJ Acuna has ruled admission of 8 motions in favor of KRY/MAEL and a non admission of 3 motions.
July 28, 1997
KRY/Mael file appeal as is their right under law, against the 3 non-admission motions.
July 31, 1997
SCJ Acuna suspends non-admittance rulings. The entire application concerning its title to Las Cristinas 4&6 is now before the full Political Administrative Chamber of the SC of Ven.
August 2, 1997
CVG/MINCA HAS BEEN DENIED REGISTRATION OF THE CONCESSIONS AS LAND_TITLES TO LC 4&6 by Bolivar State Roscio Registrar under official decision No. 6835-68.
So in case, you are still unclear, Valentine: The Supreme Court has RULED three times that Mael has VALID ownership to the LC4&6 gold concessions since 1986. This means that the MEM DID NOT have title on behalf of the STATE; therefore, they had no right to give these same to CVG, who then awarded WORK CONTRACTS (not the concessions)to PDG. PDG is out of it! CVG will shortly be as well. This is what the 4th Ruling is all about.
Finally, take a look at the gentlemen on the KRY board, their achievements, and their stature. Would these men perpetuate a fraud? Now look at your hero Ascensio. Has he ever been found guilty of fraud and deceit? Who is trying to perpetuate a fraud here? Is it you? |
