SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jan m. who wrote (13739)3/31/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Mr Logic  Read Replies (1) of 31646
 
Jan
>>If you question the information that Tim Flick so generously provided to
us, on this thread, why did you wait until he left town for one week to bring up your
doubts about the Monster Buyer? You had plenty of opportunities to discuss the
issue when he was here.<<

I have seen 'monster buyer' (or 'our 800-pound gorilla', or 'our guardian angel' etc. talk before, and generally speaking it is not good news. I could either keep that to myself, or offer the information so that anyone who has not experienced it personally can be aware that it is not uncommon and generally not good news. It is really up to you how you take it.

>>I was talking with Scott Liolios, just a few days ago. He
knows Tim very well, and told me what an honest, upfront person he is. <<

OK, I'll raise something else I considered in my DD for TAVA: Find out what Scott Liolios was saying about Global Intellicom (GBIT) when it was $7/shr. Check out the two year graph since then. (Clue, it is this shape: \).
Does it not strike you as odd that the PR guy for TAVA 'knows very well' someone who is saying how good a stock is on the internet? Someone who seems to have no problem discussing in public what might be regarded as very sensitive information? Do you think it is normal and within normal ethical guidelines for a market maker to tell people on the internet that there is a huge buy order in place for a stock? Hint: think how pleased would you be if you were the 'monster buyer' and found out that you had spent a lot more than you needed to as the price had gone up.

>>We saw
the stock move from 9.5 to 14.75 and a huge increase in volumne. So, if you can
give me another explanation for this kind of action, I'd sure like to hear it.<<

You don't want to hear it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext