SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jackdog who wrote (51657)3/31/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Read Replies (2) of 58324
 
>>Why do you people respond to this fruitcake who offers nothing but FUD submissions? Just curious, I find him laughable and especially so after reading his profile.<<

And just why is my profile laughable?

My "FUD" has a nasty way of becoming fact. Just ask many people here. In my stay here at SI's IOM thread, I have become somewhat used to being the object of scorn. There have been many who laughed at me when I said IOM was going to go down to $12/share. Never in a million years could such a thing happen. Iomega was "growing" too fast. I was also laughed at when I said IOM was going to $11. There was simply no way that IOM could ever do that. I was laughed at when I said IOM was going down to $8. Someone would "buy them out" before that happened. I was laughed at when I said IOM was going down to $7. Now, it is in the $6's. Some still choose to laugh when I say IOM will go down to $4.80. The laughers have been becoming less and less numerous.

It may be beneficial to listen to an opposing voice rather than the usual "IOM RAH! RAH! RAH!." A lot of the people who used to laugh do not laugh now. They are much poorer from IOM, bailed, and not here anymore.

I give you 2 months.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext