PHD Hank, the part time drug discoverer shows his total lack of intelligence:
<<Talk about posting in anonymity, I see no details about YOUR background. >>
Let me spell it out for you pinhead. I have never claimed special expertise. I never claimed to be a physician, researcher, executive or genius "drug discoverer." I never claimed that I should be believed for my "credentials." If you had the capacity to make a cogent argument without first telling everybody what a big expert you are, there would be no need to know who you are. You brought up the subject of your "credentials." See the distinction? I would think your mind would have some command of subtleties if you are a "drug discoverer."
<< I could buy and sell you with what I usually have in my savings account. You have NO idea who I am, what I do, or what I'm worth.>>
I see. I have no idea who you are but you know enough about me to know whether you can buy or sell me. Very logical. No wonder you are such a successful drug discoverer.
<<You can't muster any hard core facts to defend your points.>>
I have posted more facts on this board than your little pea brain could hold. You still have not given one shred of back up to your initial assertion that with the approval of Viagra, Vasomax will never be approved. We should just believe you because of who you are, but you don't have the guts to come forward. Since you don't, stop boring us all with how great you are and start proving what you say.
<<Most of my comments have been based on verifiable facts. >>
So verify it, Hank.
<<You're like a little child in the school yard >>
Actually Hank, that's precisely what I thought about you when you posted this:
<<But hey, I'd love to sit here and talk science with you all day but I have to go and help develop some real drugs for approval now. >>
That had to be the most asinine thing I have ever read, on or off line. And what did you do after you wrote it? You just kept on posting! Caught in a lie and too much hubris to admit it. Tragic flaw, Hank.
I started my last post with the following:
<<Hank wrote about me:
<<If there is anyone that is unable to allow for the possibility of being wrong, it is you. >>
In one of his first posts on the Zona board he wrote:
<<Vasomax stands NO chance of approval by the FDA >>
I challenge you to find one post where I said that there is no chance for Vasomax not to be approved. I have always acknowledged the risks of this stock. You are the one who has irresponsibly claimed absolute certainty.>>
You haven't answered my challenge, Hank. Caught in another lie! Come on Hank. I've been posting here for over a year. Find one post where I said that Vasomax will definitely be approved. I dare you.
|
