SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)
EDTA 0.000200+300.1%Mar 7 3:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: GRC who wrote (1727)4/1/1998 4:31:00 AM
From: m rosen  Read Replies (1) of 2383
 
Judge Jones is not required to hold a Markman hearing, she can
decide the scope of the patent is narrow without holding any Markman
hearing. Judge Jones can also decide on a broader interpretation of
the patent without a markman and proceed directly to trial by jury on
the infringement issue. Or, and most likely, Judge Jones could have a
Markman hearing as you have stated. But a narrow scope of interpretation would mean the patent would have limited if any application, a narrow scope of decision has historically correlated
to a quicker markman in patent infringement cases in the federal
courts, not only in Jone's court room but generally across all federal
circuit courts. I would challenge you to find one narrow interpretation
result that took six months from the date all papers had been filed with
the court, for the judge to decide whether to hold a markman hearing?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News