<..and yet another company's definition of QOS = "Bandwidth Management"..>
<..It's an old Debate..>
Give it up, rev. It was a debate only in YOUR mind. You continue to be lacking in your understanding of the datacom term QoS. (Hint, it is NOT related to YOUR use of the colloquial, NON-technical descriptions "good service", "quality service", "good old-fashioned service" or "service with a smile") Both Geoff Hollingsworth and I explained this to you.
<..that was never concluded..>
Only in YOUR mind. (...tell me you are kidding)
<..but then I never give up..>
Heard that! (What was bill c's motto? "..right or wrong, this is what I believe.."?)
<. when I know my perspective is correct...>
Sad...
<..QoS (Quality of Service) In Networking it is how reliable is your End to End Solution to the Client/Customer...>
Didn't you read ANYTHING you were given? Spend some time reading about ATM ("asynchronous transfer mode"). And maybe find someone who knows about networking to help you with this (I'm sure, Geoff could help you) and you can get FAR ahead of your faulty attempts at THIS silly and embarrassing "see-I-was-right" game.
ATM bandwidth (which translates to a fixed bit rate defined by the mod scheme) guarantees such as CBR are QoS parameters.
But even if you eventually ARE successful in finding someone who, like yourself, misuses the term, it is STILL a misuse. You might want to re-read (if you ever DID read it) the article you errantly posted in your own defense, which in fact directly ATTACKED sloppy uses, such as yours, of these networking management terms.
I'm confidant that with some time, determination and help, you too can come to understand more clearly what networking "QoS" both IS and ISN'T.
Ignorance only exists if you LET it.
Good luck. |
