Jin, you of course realize by now that you are mistaken.
Do you wish to revise history by saying that FAMH issued a faulty release, corrected itself to the satisfaction of ATXI, and then (and only then) ATXI issued its angry denial?
<<<LOOK AT THE TIME STAMP FROM THE PR'S ON FRIDAY! THE RETRACTION CAME BEFORE ATXI'S RELEASE. QUIT MISLEADING PEOPLE!>>>>
Apparently so... hee hee, as you would put it. Who's misleading whom? I know you won't apologize, but some people here will obviously believe such a thing. I mean, it's in CAPITAL LETTERS and everything.
The release from FAMH issuing the correction came out at Friday March 27, 6:38 pm Eastern Time, according to Post #8614 of Markox5. About an hour after ATXI slapped back, as I recall.
After a couple days, once the tit-for-tat debate between the two companies had subsided, the news services removed both: A) the original version of FAMH's press release, and B) the correction notice that followed.
No need for either, since the original is now corrected, and the corrected version is posted in the original's place. Slotman now quotes the corrected version (ad nauseam) as proof that FAMH never claimed to have a mutual letter signed.
Again, the original SI posts contain the original release. Anyone can look them up. Please don't rewrite history. |
