SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill Jackson who wrote (2494)4/2/1998 1:05:00 AM
From: brian krause  Read Replies (1) of 3744
 
Bill, if a doctor had proof of my disease and the public had a interest in my health I doubt would need to be disclosed. ( other than in the interest of public health it would probably be required for a disclosure to be made naming the disease....being highly contagious.... but naming the disease and it's hazards, not necessarily the name of the infected) If a lawyer knew of it nothing would be required. If an engineering firm had knowledge of it I think they would be required to disclose the fact.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News