Did Slick Boink Monica? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Did Slick Boink Monica?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DMaA who wrote (12635)	4/2/1998 10:07:00 AM
From: Triluminary	Read Replies (2) of 20981

How true... don't forget fondle, fawn, touch, and grab. It seems there are only two possibilities from Judge Wright's decision. o She concluded that the touching and grabbing occurred and was not illegal. o She concluded that Jones' lawyers did not have sufficient evidence to prove that the touching and grabbing occurred regardless of the legality. If the latter, it is solely a matter of Wright's opinion and could easily be overturned. If the former, looks like this case has set a legal precedent that as long as one propositions (no matter how boorish ie. touch, grab, and expose yourself) only once and it's not done on company grounds it's perfectly legal! Either way it is a Pyrrhic victory. (Perhaps Phallic victory? ;)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next