Still, you evade key elements to the scenario.
I certainly don't look kindly on Zapara. But, Mork told Charlie, and his lawyer, Zapara shorted the stock because Mork told him too. Mork told Charlie, his lawyer as a witness, that he'd short it to $.10. Yet, you say I put too much focus on Mork!! <LOL>
Mork supeona-ed shareholders as defendants and witnesses, Mork hired guys to slam RMIL on the internet, Mork set up a web-site to spread misinformation, you, Martin & Kugler are here on his behalf...isn't that enough to warrant attention paid to Mork, not to mention Baker, PEMP, A&G Holdings, etc. Mork has an estimated short position in Canada of 5MM shares and you steer us to Zapara?!! Zapara is also being sued by Mork.
You say you want to focus on the company, thats well and good, but of course a short trap, dude, the float is in certificate form. You want to mask the illegal short position and the criminal shortsellers by trying to make RMIL scam.
The best thing a shortseller can hope for is the co. is a scam and the illegal shortsellers can terminally short it to zero. You can recieve your accolades as a consumer advocate and the illegal shortsellers never have to cover.
The problem is, RMIL is a small BB co. trying to lift itself up by the boot heels with this merger, you and Kugler work overtime to prevent that and see to it that the co. is brought to its knees. You do dirty work Tonto, yet you try to sell yourself as someone clean, far from it!!
You know I know what you and Kugler and Martin are doing here, as long as RMIL shareholders stick together with the certified float, Mork will pay out the backside.
You won't address Mork, when in fact you are more intimate with Mork than Zapara, as faR as I'm concerned , they both reek. You will not shake us, and we see thru you though some others don't!
Pugs |
