Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lucretius who wrote (17969)	4/3/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: RGinPG	Read Replies (3) of 95453

Uhmmmm.... Are you making fun of me? Nothing like kicking a dog while he's down. :>) Actually, your post gives me a chance to say something I've been thinking about. It seems as though the stocks that have been doing the best, just keep doing the best, and the laggards continue to lag regardless of fundamentals. Examples: Winners -vs- Not such great winners NE -vs- FLC GLBL -vs- FGII RIG -vs- DO MDCO -vs CDG RDC -vs- ESV PDS -vs- GW VRC -vs- EVI CXIPY -vs- everyone I've seen the strategy in the past on this thread to buy the laggards because they will eventually participate. I'm wondering about the wisdom of this. It may be better to stick with the winners. The fundamentals (which we know can change based on events we may not know about, but the market may know about)are almost as good, if not as good in the winners. So why bother with the others?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next