Pugs,
If you wish to subscribe to the "short" theory, that's great. I am here for the same reason. Do you think that I think this company has super fundementals? Heck no, I'm here for the short squeeze. I'm with you 100% on this.
However, we have already heard Riley say that even he does not know what is going on.
I say, what's wrong with making this a two-pronged attack? You continue doing DD on the "short side" and, in the meantime, we find out from Gary and Roland just what they're up to. Is there some flaw in this strategy?
I have no reason to trust Gary or Roland. What have they done for me lately, or ever? Mike Puhr? I don't know him, either. Yet, when and if the money comes, and it may well already be here, he can do what he wants. HE is no longer contractually bound, right? I don't know any of these people, except by reputation, and that's not real good. However, I do know both you and Paul from talking to you on the phone. You are both good people, both interested in your investment, as I am.
Your "arch enemy, tonto" has made one point which you can not deny. Our strength comes from our solidarity. Well, then, let us remain united! Having a two pronged attack is not a sign of dis-unity, it is a sign of some smarts. I can't speak for the others. they are probably only here for their investment, which is great. I, however, do subscribe to your theory. I am here to "bust the shorts".
How about we all do this together? Paul's e-mail adress was just posted. I would expect to see him back on the e-mail thread right away. Let's all do what we can from whatever our points of view. OK?
Very best regards,
AD |
