OObserver, Friend, Thanks...
Had no one in particular in mind: though you know who
I might be talking about on the Yahoo! thread. That's
too easy. And, anyway, "he's" proved himself to be
mostly right. Which only, of course, just pisses me off
royally.
The plain fact is, we all want to be gurus at least
on some level. We want the admiration, respect, or even
fear of our fellow thread-izens. At least, I do...
Which reminds me, there are certain thread-izens on
the Yahoo! scene who drop in, say something authoritative
and guru-like, then disappear for three months, come back
and expect us to remember how sagacious they were... which,
oddly enough, in some cases they were. One such drop-in
said words to the effect, "Of course, no one pays attention
to me." Guilt-tripping in the anonymous land of Cinnamoan
isn't a good play. Guilt requires a certain familiarity...
or pictures of starving kids that I can't turn away from.
In anonymous, text-based form it just sort of annoys me... like a tse-tse
fly. (See under WHY WON'T YOU LET ME PLAY THOSE REINDEER
GAMES.) The better play is appealing to my fantasies... my
desire to have 15,000,000 shares of Wally World, etc.
As for SEEK, couldn't agree with you more about testing
and breaking old highs next week. Actually, I thought
it would happen this past week. Seemed like a lead-pipe
cinch. But, I'm going on vacation to, uhhhh, Barbada,
or, ummmmmmm, Bermudos, or my favorite Carribbean resort,
Porte Cochere.
Best Regards,
c m |
