SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (13340)4/5/1998 1:22:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker  Read Replies (1) of 39621
 
TOO ALL WHO POST HERE ON HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVITIES: TO ALL MEN AND WOMEN HERE PRESENT I OFFER THESE THOUGHTS, AND HOPE THAT THEY ARE WELL READ AND COMMITED TO FAINT MEMORIES BY THOSE WHOSE MINDS HAVE LOST THE ABILITY TO COMPREHEND ANYTHING STEMMING FROM DECENT THOUGHT:

I would say with all total honesty and completely based on all human experience that those who are disgusted by same body parts sex, one person somehow pretending to ttake the role of a member of the opposite sex is disgusting to them in the same exact way a rotting mouse pulsating with maggots is repulsive.

I can still remember the first pulsating mouse I discovered at about 8 years old. It was the most horrible thing I had ever seen, and could hardly comprehend anything that horrible happening to a cute little mouse.

Actually, those that are attracted to it are out doing it or blabbering constantly about how we must LOVE THE HOMOSEXUAL.

Bob, I've had ten of the bi and homo people on SI say the same thing to me. When they say that, you know they are totally out of ammunition of any kind and desperately are just thowing rocks like a little kid.

It is not even a cheap shot. It's boring, and totally shows me that the person responding out of moral bankruptcy in FACT HAS NOTHING ELSE OF HUMAN THOUGHT TO OFFER IN SUPPORT OF HOMOSEXUAL PREFERENCE OF LUST. There is no way to justify it other than protecting this sexual lust by law, and enforcing the activity, which is actually classified in the Websters as "perversion."

Because of this, they will re-write the Websters, wait and see. This section will have to go:

Perverse: Turned away from that which is good or right.
OBSTINATE IN OPPOSING THAT WHICH IS REASONABLE OR ACCEPTED.

Pervert: To lead astray. Corrupt. (esp. the young (sic)). To
divert to a wrong purpose. MISAPPLY (AS IN EVIDENCE).
Syn. with DEPRAVE OR DEBASE.

second example of pervert: noun: ONE THAT IS PERVERTED, ESP. A
PERSON GIVEN TO SEXUAL PERVERSION.

Now to recap with the word "Perversion", which encumpasses all of the above into one meaning:

"THE ACTION OF PERVERTING: THE CONDITION OF BEING PERVERTED.
A PERVERTED FORM OF SOMETHING,ESP. SEXUAL PERVERSION.

Mr. Webster and I rest our case. Bob, don't even respond to the perverted's accusation that because a plate of maggots is a loathesome idea to you, that you really WANT to eat a plate of maggots. Same exact thinking on their part, exactly the same concept to the heterosexual whose thoughts and desires are as God intended, and
this tired accusation that heterosexuals are repulsed because they actually ARE DRAWN is....well, ALSO PERVERTED. Consider the source. What do you expect. We have flamers posting here, so lost in this particular lust they are trapped and they know it. The one's that are so kind and forgiviung and tolerant---Now, THEY could be drawn, I don't know. It does cause me wonder sometimes.

I assume it is just extreme Christian tolerance for a particular form of lust.

Clinton is trying to sign a sneaked-through bill into national law which will make the above statement of fact, and the posting of Webster's definition of pervert as a hate crime.

I'm going to post about it now on a separate statement post.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext