Yep, Brooke. 24 is wrong, should be 26.
In case someone is trying to compare the R1 and R2 scans,
----------
maup:=0;
for i = 0 to -60 step -5 do
ma50:=movavg(i,50,Cl); //use it twice
if movavg(i,10,Cl)> ma50 and
ma50 > movavg(i-5,50,Cl)then
maup:=maup + 2;
endif;
next i;
-----------
doesn't exactly match the 'marto' scan because it compares the
50-day MA for an additional week, -65.
To duplicate his exactly would require messier code, such as
--------------
maup:=0;
for i = 0 to -60 step -5 do
ma50:=movavg(i,50,Cl); //use it twice
if movavg(i,10,Cl)> ma50 then
maup:=maup + 1; // 13 max
endif;
if ma50 > movavg(i-5,50,Cl)
and i != -60 then
maup:=maup + 1; // 12 max, sum = 25
endif;
next i;
--------
Ran these two scans and got 83 hits for maup = 26 and 94
for this mod (with maup = 25).
His current scan
ccnet.com
has 90 hits, but I haven't compared the contents of the 3.
Bob |
