SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corp: Digital Storage
AMPX 12.24+15.7%Feb 6 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: HPilot who wrote (477)10/29/1996 8:38:00 AM
From: Glenn Perry   of 3256
 
>>>I read on an AOL post that Data Storage Magazine stated that this technology WILL be on hard drives in 97 so maybe it is a done deal!<<<

Not exactly. The authors of the article said to expect to see keepered media to be used in hard-drives in 1997 - just a forward-looking projection, but not an "it's in the bag" statement. Obviously, it is a positive statement, but it's also what Ampex has been saying for quite some time - they expect to sign some sort of agreement with one or more disk manufacturers by the end of 1996.
A couple of important benefits of using keepered media were addressed in the article. One was that as densities approach 10 GB per square inch, the data might become unstable over time. The keepered layer could reduce this demagetization making a more stable high-density storage system. Another point was that Ampex has been working with uncoated media supplied by outside vendors, then applying the keepered layer and testing the media. Apparently, the keepered system hasn't been optimized, and none of the keepered media tested were manufactured using a continuous disk deposition process. They then described several ways in which the system could be optimized, including using a thinner medium, optimizing proximity keepered media, and designing a keepered media to achieve gains with MR heads. I thought it was important when they said that keepered media could allow higher flying heights while increasing capacity, thereby reducing the durability concerns normally associated with low-flying or contact heads. As you lower the flying height of the head assembly, you increase the probability of crashing the hard drive. You also need a much stiffer head assembly.

IMO, we should see a contract shortly. Eventually, I feel this process will be optimized and used with all methods of thin-film magnetic media storage. My bet is that Western Digital will be the first to sign an agreement. Here's my reasoning: They recently broke the 1-GB/platter limit while still using inductive heads. Less than 2 years ago they claimed their top capacity was 427-MB/platter, and about 9 months ago it was only 640-MB/platter. Recently they were able to achieve 1,056-Mb platter by reshaping the poles in the tripad head. Now their engineers believe they can extend inductive technology to at least 1.5-GB/platter. This was stated in a previous issue of Data Storage in a technology update report by editor-in-chief, Ernest Raia. My guess it that they will achieve this by using Ampex's keepered media!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext