SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cymer (CYMI)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bryan Steffen who wrote (16380)4/7/1998 10:03:00 AM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) of 25960
 
RE: I would argue that it will slow the semi companies' advance to new equipment/smaller architectures.

My reasoning is this. 1) As cheaper PCs create greater market penetration, they create tremendous margin pressure. 2) In order to combat margin pressure the Intels of the world pump more volume. 3) They will also try to stretch any given processor's market life as long as possible. Therefore that means a slower advance toward smaller
architectures.


1. Yes, margin pressure which requires manufacturing efficiencies be improved in the form of more dice per wafer acheived through shrinks.

2. You have two options for higher volumes. Shrinks and 300mm wafer sizes. The former benefits the 0.25um companies and the latter would benefit the entire industry.

3. Um, stretching the life of processors in a time of increasing competition? The industry doesn't work that way. The increased competition in MPUs has accelerated every company's move to more advanced processes. We've seen a contraction in process generation lifetimes. Intel which introduced 0.25um this past fall is introducing 0.18 at the end of this year, AMD started on 0.35 in '97 and is moving to 0.25 one year later, and National which hasn't begun manufacturing at South Portland on 0.25 is talking about 0.18 by the middle of next year. This is NOT a slowdown in Moore's Law.

Again, we're witnessing an acceleration in the move to more advanced processes.

Also, have you considered what a reduction in MPU prices, PCs on a chip, and ultimately PC/information appliance prices mean for unit volumes and ultimately DRAM consumption? Do 100M units using 40MB on average consume more DRAM than 300M units using 20MB to 30MB on average?

RE: NYCNPBBKR comment: Rumor has it that Cymer is going to beat earnings estimates this report but will warn on the next 2 quarter's earnings.

I expect them to beat estimates this quarter and so do a lot of other people on the thread. Next two quarters? Well, I hear there's some kind of trouble in Asia or something <G>, so a flat quarter or two would not be a surprise.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext