<< And I think he deserves more credibility then those countless press releases, articles, and all the rest of the organized PR & positive spin that is posted on this board put together! >>
Credibility for "not posting" substantive information?
We shouldn't pay attention to news and analysis of Ligand's science? How is one to find out about Ligand?
Your post makes very little sense. I am invested in LGND because I think that their science is strong. I am diversified. LGND is just one of my holdings. Should I sell my shares because tonyt, who has an obvious vendetta against Henry, keeps predicting that LGND will go down, in a volitile sector that has trailed the market for two years? Of course not.
But, if you had your way, there would be no posting of articles and information about Ligand. We would only listen to tonyt's gloomy, mean-spirited rants and raves about LGND. Give me a break!
You obviously prefer to invest in stocks based on the predictions of someone who knows nothing about the company, and only has a dislike for the one, Henry, that supplies the most informative information and analysis.
Tonyt might've "guessed" the directions of LGND based on some kind of hocus-pocus and jealousy, but I prefer to stick with fundamentals.
Speaking of which, my prediction is that LGND is going to pull back, no lower than 14, and then be at $20 by the end of June, or, according to Walter, when we hit 20,000 posts! <g>
Regards, Bob
P.S. My prediction is based on the movement of LGND over the last three years, around this time of year, and increased strength in the company. A little hocus, a little pocus, perhaps? But, at least I'll admit to it. |
