Why don't one of you--who've got more money me--try and get a check cut from NETZ. Officially correspond with the company. Do you really think you're going to find Hayton's name on the check? In fact, show me any company document--since Lair has come on board--that has Hayton's signature. YOU CAN'T DO IT!!!
Show me Lair's signature on those checks. I bet you, in the very least, Hayton is a co-signer.
I almost wish they'd sue some of you folks who are spreading false and malicious rumors about NETZ. It sickens me and creates a lot of unnecessary work for those of us who find value in this company.
I agree... and I think I should sue Wall Street Equities for their false and malicious rumors.
But, Matty, don't make the matter worse by distorting the facts. Had the announcement been properly formated, the announcement of ZuluMedia and Lair's appointment to its board would have caused a gain of seven or more pennies. So it's not quite as you describe it, Mr. Naysayer.
To put me in the Naysayer category would be too easy for you, PartyTime. I have more to lose than you if NETZ fails. It sets the web advertising industry back a year or two from completely blooming. I'm here to make sure you all ask the correct questions to them to make sure they don't. Perhaps I am needling the company to release a statement saying that Hayton doesn't have anything to do with NETZ at all, and that he doesn't sign the checks, and doesn't have anything to do with the workings of the company(which I still don't believe). Ask Mr. Lair who hired him next time you call. Ask who was the orchestrator of the merger.
And yes, Matty, there's a couple of people who will agree with you. Wouldn't you, if you were intending to buy back into this stock, want the price to be as low as possible before the financials are released? When they do come out, and you're quick enough because you follow, you therefore won't have to pay and arm and a leg to get back in. Does anyone find this scenario plausible? I do.
Yeah, it is a plausible scenario. But so is the scenario that you are intending to defend this stock tooth and nail even though you know the person who started this company has been a crook in the past(repeatedly, mind you, not just once), just because you want to make a great deal of money.
PartyTime, my average cost before the big runup was .47. I made some good money because Wired forced me out. What does a few pennies mean to me? I want the truth before I invest, and that's something that has been lacking with this company. The truth.
How dare you accuse me(and yes, you were accusing me, although you addressed it to everyone else) of spreading rumors when your precious company has been doing it for months! Mine have yet to be disproven; many of theirs have already been.
Matty Gregg |
