International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ron Struthers who wrote (31482)	4/8/1998 1:46:00 AM
From: Larry Brubaker	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Ron: Sorry, still don't buy it. The December 96 PR identified 6 holes with values ranging from .228 to .363 opt. It included a diagram illustrating that those holes were scattered throughout the 1 km grid. It compared these results to previous results from the same holes with values ranging from .037 to .068 opt. It attributed the new results to a "breakthrough" in the ASSAY technique, not to an improved recovery process. You now appear to be trying to suggest that investors were jumping to conclusions not warranted by the information put out by IPM. Sorry again, but that is an insult to my intelligence. I am already insulted enough for believing the hype put out by IPM. I refuse to be further insulted by this attempt to rewrite the IPM history book.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next