Ron, you are reading stuff that is not there in my posts.
Stating that IR has a vested interest in stock appreciation and that it would be interesting to know if insiders sold, and at what price is completely non-contentious. Isn't it?
This is equally relevant to shorts and longs.
The words pumping, dumping, fantasy, hypish promoter, bail out, scam, and really greedy are all yours - please don't associate them with me.
And as you accuse me of "groundless rumor mongering", what was the rumour that I mongered groundlessly?
This the entire text of my post that started it:
Raju, the guys at Pacific Consulting Group were given 75,000 shares or options
between them - Scott himself got 35,500. They were already registered for free sale
after December, so it would be interesting to know how many they still hold.
If they still hold them, I would say that is a good thing.
John Jenkins was able to sell 235,000 as part of the same disclosure. Same question
applies.
Maybe we should drop it and discuss something else.
Patrick.
ps. Just to disagree on something else,
>>Face it, the only reason there is weakness in this stock is because this company has
not been allowed to release the information its shareholders and the market crave.<<
...illogical captain. The stock went up on no news, from the $8-$9 range. The base point since news is therefore $8-$9. The $14 point is not one from which there can be 'weakness'. It would be correct to say that the stock is showing *strength* on no news, as it has risen from $9-$11. If it was at $7, that would be weakness.
That's one reason I don't understand the comments about the stock being 'on sale' at $11, simply because it flew to $14 on no news! |
