Simula (SMU) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Simula (SMU)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: michael c. dodge who wrote (1073)	4/8/1998 11:39:00 AM
From: Noblesse Oblige	Read Replies (1) of 1671

Hi Michael, Jaime.... You are both right on the money. Though Ford appears to have selected side impact, seat mounted airbags for its fleet, you will note in the body of the NY Times article that the company is still considering padding for the roof for 201 Compliance. Padding is a less effective alternative than active systems, and Ford is well aware of that fact. The final decision will be made based on competitive factors. At the moment, any publicity we get for side-impact protection and the devices that protect against that type of collision is a plus for Simula. I will have more to write later.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next