FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JIN CHUN who wrote (11136)	4/8/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (2) of 27968

A number of similarities between FAMH and QZARF... 1) Both offer huge unaudited earnings and projections of huge growth 2) Both claimed that "big money" was about to flow into the stock 3) Both issued huge amounts of stock (Q-zar 28 million, FAMH 40 million) 4) Both sold at suspiciously low P/E's in regard to their "earnings" 5) Both sets of stockholders put their faith entirely in the company president: 6) Both claimed profit margins way out of line to their industry 7) Both concerned themselves more with rapid expansion than delivering financials 8) Wild claims of future stock prices by cheerleaders, based on the "huge profits" already reported? Both. 9) People visited their locations, with glowing reports... There's plenty more.... L.E. P.S. to Jin: The reverse split was brought up in NOVEMBER on this thread... before I signed up. <<<<You single handedly claimed to have made Ira correct the figures. Who are you? Charles friggin Schwab? I don't think so. Give us the DD to back up your claim.>>> I gave the DD back in Post #1436. This post was done on January 15, two months after FAMH annonced third quarter earnings. Up until my post, they claimed .06 EPS for that quarter. Within a few days of my post, after repeated questions from shareholders, they re-stated the 3rd Q earnings as .03 EPS, half the original figure. I'm sure you consider that a coincidence! LOL! BTW.. who do you think owns the "algorithms" for 3-D sound and licenses them to chipmakers at a 40% net profit? SRSL does.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next