CYRIX / NSM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM

NSM 18.27

0.0%

Jul 31 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steve Porter who wrote (25793)	4/8/1998 10:52:00 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) of 33344

Steve, The other advantage of doing more in one clock cycle as opposed to many clock cycles is this: You spend fewer cycles (as a %) waiting on memory and more (again as a %) doing actual work. That's the reason why Cyrix chips perform so well, and it may well be a model for the future (witness Intel's Merced, it tries to do TONS in one cycle, as opposed to screaming around at 800Mhz). The ideal thing would be to have a CPU that does a lot every cycle AND high clock speed. Merced will apparently have both. I just wonder how it will perform standard x86 instructions. I think it will be a while before the popular applications are rewritten / recompiled for Merced. The momentum will be slowed further by high initial prices of Merced CPUs ($2,000+ as was reported recently). I don't think Intuit will go out of it's way to get a Merced version of of Quicken. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next