Wes, My only purpose for appearing on this thread is to ask certain questions (trenchant or not) about XECOM and hopefully get some meaningful answers. I apologize to you, Wes, and everyone who reads this thread if my questions seem "ad nauseam." THE BIGGEST PROBLEM ABOUT THIS THREAD, WHICH I THINK IS A PROBLEM FOR XECOM AND ITS INVESTORS, IS THAT IT IS JUST ABOUT THE ONLY PLACE A PERSOM CAN GO FOR INFORMATION ABOUT XECOM. BELIEVE ME, ANYONE READING THIS THREAD THROUGHOUT THE MONTHS AND YEARS HAS TO FEEL RATHER LIKE AN IDIOT CONSIDERING BUYING SHARES OF XECOM. NOT BECAUSE SUBSTANTIVE ARGUMENTS AGAINST XECOM'S CHANCES OF BECOMING PROFITABLE APPEAR HERE, BUT BECAUSE THE COMPANY IS TREATED LIKE A JOKE. WHICH IT SHOULDN'T BE BECAUSE THE NUMBERS OFFER REASONS TO BELIEVE--IN MY OPINION.
I have asked questions which, if answered properly and thoroughly might, encourage interest in XECOM. Suckerfinder, who without a doubt has short interest in XECOM or has a major bone to pick with current XECOM management, discourages investment in XECOM by MOCKING me (and you too, Wes) and my questions, which if discussed at length would show, I believe, real potential for XECOM. He does not discuss numbers of business plans because he understands--the way a professional understands--that the best way to discourage someone from doing something is not to make them feel like they were just wrong if are wrong, but that they have been taken for, well, a sucker.
Wes, Dal has said $15 to $18 million for XECOM in 1998. If that turns out to be true, no way you're going to still be seeing .18/share. Dal could do us all a big favor by outlining the business plan that gets us to $18 million, including revenue projections for each quarter of 1998. $15 to $18 million, I assume, are not numbers that were just picked out of a hat. Sincerely, TJS (Who is neither SF or JL)
|
