you are clearly correct and i am wrong. tim should be able to call people names and make patently false claims, we still have the first amendment.
where did this begin?
this little diddy to greg h2o
Let me correct you I was the one who said run like hell when the stock was at 50 but nobody believed me. Then stock took the big dive, I then became bullish in the low 20's and bought back in myself. - tim luke
this is tim hyping tim. sorry, you need to rethink you statement about tim not hyping tim. sorry but this is just not true, he purchased at 37 and 27, sold at 23 1/2, and told everyone else to sell. this is called hype, and tim raised the issue, not me or anyone else.
next:
back I will be forced to blankFULLofcrapMIND in his place.
where were you?
tim can predict all he wants, that is not the issue, and you do not see anything about me criticizing his predictions. coming back after predicting wrong in the 20's and early 30's and then saying how you were a buyer is deceptive and wrong, and dare i say hyping.
i hope this clarifies the issue, it is not hyping, but hyping after clearly stating the opposite in the past, and now claiming otherwise. |
