Cheryl, thanks for your comprehensive response. As always you describe what I said as nonsense and then proceed to avoid the question before issuing another nicely presented CK press release covering a whole range of nice sounding points irrelevant to the issue at hand.
OK, OK, I give in, Cheryl You win the presentation war!!!. Now, how about some content?
- how many of these companies are using the CD, and using it without TAVA assistance? There is a limit to how thinly TAVA can spread itself. The big bucks for TAVA are in high volume, zero effort sales of the CD, not pilots and contracts taking up their scarce resource. Fine, of course they can use the packaged CD methodology in their work with these clients. But hey need to sell many thousands of them to make significant Y2K money. You can easily work out the numbers for yourself.
>>Have you looked at the CD demo? (Not too many available in the UK.) I have. And so have a few of the engineers on this thread.<<
...and what? You admit you don't know anything about the plant floor environment. Let's hear someone knowledgeable try to tell us that the CD is anything else than what I described it as. Why don't you challenge what I say, I didn't spend time looking at the demos because I enjoy it.
>>ROFL - If it's SO easy, why doesn't TAVA have any competitors in this arena? Seems like a lot of companies would like to get on the bandwagon.<<
TAVA does have competitors in this area, that's the point. Hey, I'm getting better at this highlighting stuff.
This is bread and butter to Project Managers, particularly if they work for a consulting house bodyshop and specialise in plant floor stuff. It is not proprietary. I think half the people here must think it somehow fixes year 2000 problems. It doesn't. OK, maybe it diagnoses and tests equipment? wrong again. It doesn't do that either. What do you think it does Cheryl?
P.
ps: you also win the irritating "I'm so much smarter than you" laugh with the liberal sprinkling of "LOL" and "ROFL"s. |
